Mike De Palmer vs Danie Visser Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. De Palmer vs D. Visser

Mike De Palmer

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Left-Handed

Danie Visser

RSA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-To-Head: Palmer 2 - 0 Visser

They have played 5 sets in total, with Mike De Palmer winning 4 and Danie Visser winning 1. The last match between Mike De Palmer and Danie Visser was at the Tel Aviv, 14-10-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Mike De Palmer getting the victory 6-2 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Palmer	2
Visser	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Tel Aviv(10-14-85)

Stats

Mike De Palmer

Danie Visser

(R3) Vienna(10-18-82)

Stats

Mike De Palmer

Danie Visser

M. D. Palmer vs D. Visser H2H Profile

M. D. Palmer	Stats	D. Visser
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.55% (81-93)	Career Total W/L	44.05% (111-141)
2	Hard	0
0	Titles	1
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. D. Palmer vs D. Visser Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mike De Palmer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Danie Visser has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mike De Palmer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Danie Visser has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mike De Palmer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Danie Visser has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mike De Palmer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Danie Visser winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mike De Palmer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 13/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 15/ 19). Danie Visser has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 6/ 17).
Player level: In the last year, Mike De Palmer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Danie Visser has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mike De Palmer winning 2 times and Danie Visser being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Mike De Palmer winning 4 and Danie Visser winning 1. The last match between Mike De Palmer and Danie Visser was at the Tel Aviv, 14-10-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Mike De Palmer getting the victory 6-2 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mike De Palmer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Danie Visser has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mike De Palmer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Danie Visser has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mike De Palmer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Danie Visser has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mike De Palmer vs Danie Visser Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. D. Palmer vs D. Visser H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. D. Palmer	Stats	D. Visser
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	1
29	Games Won	26
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. D. Palmer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg CH - 01-05-1989
R4 Peter PalandjianP. Palandjian	L	6-2 7-6	Stats
R3 Stefan Van SchalkwykS. Van	W	2-6 6-2 6-2	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 12-09-1988
R3 Gary DonnellyG. Donnelly	W	6-3 7-6	Stats
R4 Scott DavisS. Davis	L	5-7 6-4 7-6	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 18-07-1988
R3 David NainkinD. Nainkin	L	0-6 7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

D. Visser Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berlin - 07-10-1991
R1 Udo RiglewskiU. Riglewski	L	7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 05-08-1991
R1 Ronald AgenorR. Agenor	W	6-4 3-6 7-6(2)	Stats
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Berlin - 08-10-1990
R2 Milan SrejberM. Srejber	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Franco DavinF. Davin	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

M. D. Palmer vs D. Visser Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. D. Palmer	Stats	D. Visser
46.55% (81/93)	YTD Win/Loss	44.05% (111/141)
47.79% (227/248)	Sets Win/Loss	46.67% (315/360)
48.69% (2283/2406)	Games Win/Loss	49.16% (3314/3427)
45.24% (38/46)	Hard Win/Loss	45.19% (61/74)
46.43% (13/15)	Clay Win/Loss	26.09% (6/17)
53.57% (15/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	48.00% (12/13)
44.12% (15/19)	Grass Win/Loss	46.38% (32/37)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
488.78	Average Opponent Rank	379.74
40.00% (12/18)	Slam W/L	48.94% (23/24)
33.33% (4/8)	Masters W/L	41.38% (12/17)
50.42% (60/59)	Main Tour W/L	39.31% (57/88)
38.46% (5/8)	Challenger W/L	61.29% (19/12)
48% (67/140)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (85/199)
41% (14/34)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	48% (25/52)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	67% (2/3)
49% (33/68)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (37/89)
73% (84/61)	1st Set Won, Won Match	72% (121/87)
27% (84/23)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	28% (121/34)
22% (90/20)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (130/23)